Science, politics and smoking.
The Democratic leadership in the Wisconsin State Legislature is trying to pass a statewide smoking ban in restaraunts and bars. However, at least one Democrat is strongly against it. When State Senator Roger Breske (D-Eland) was asked about Health and Human Services support of the smoking ban (based on scientific research into the dangers of second hand smoke), how do you think Breske responded?
As an educated public servant, did he acknowledge the science and explain that policy needs to be a balance between the science, economic issues, and personal liberties? Nope, he said this-
“…that’s hogwash. I was born and raised in a bar since I was that high, and I was tending bar since I was that high (holding hand four feet above the ground.) And there was only one light bulb in the bar. There was no fans, and everyone smoked. It was blue in there. Come on, I’m still alive, and I’m 69 years old. It’s sickening.”
So, because his single data point is still alive, the science is wrong? My hope for 2008 is that we can get some politicians that understand and respect science.
video – comments start around the 19 minute mark.
February 3rd, 2008 at 9:55 pm
Breske is walking science. He’s been exposed to secondhand smoke his entire life, he’s 69 years old, and he’s alive.
February 3rd, 2008 at 10:37 pm
Joey, A data point of one isn’t science. It’s an anecdote.